|
 |
 |
|
SDNP-ENVIS OF ICEF SMALL GRANT PROGRAMME
|
News
Clippings
German
expert urges e-waste assessment (November
23 2005 -The Hindu) Says
existing informal recycling system poses
environment and health hazards |
Chennai:
A German e-waste management expert has
underlined the need to immediately conduct
a Waste Equipment (WEEE) assessment in
Chennai. Such an assessment is required
to prepare an inventory of e-waste. Such
as assessment is required to prepare an
inventory of e-waste as the present informal
recycling system posed "great environmental
and health threat," said Jurgen Porst,
the expert serving as the senior adviser
with the Karnataka State Pollution Control
Board. Addressing Enviro-2005, a conference
on environmental safety and health, organised
by the Confederation of Indian Industry,
southern region, here on Tuesday, Dr.
Porst urged the Tamil Nadu Government
to establish a nodal agency in Chennai,
on the lines of that set up in Karnataka,
to look into e-waste management. |
Scientific
landfill:
It is imperative for Chennai and Kerala
devise ways to introduce scientific e-waste
and hazardous waste management systems,
including creation of a scientific landfill
using compacted clay layer, HDPE sheets
and geo textile sheets. Stating this,
he said it was important to train and
upgrade the informal recycling units,
as the crude recycling units, as the crude
recycling practices, particularly the
open air burning of toxic metals, pose
health and environment hazards. The units
were attracted to the field because of
the small quantity of gold and high value
metal deposits found in the electronic
components. |
No
policy:
A CII press release said Dr. Porst observed
at the meeting that there was no policy
either at the State or national level
to address the challenges posed by e-waste.
Delhi disposed a minimum 12,000 tonnes
of e-waste in 2004. Bangalore, which had
1322 software companies, 38 hardware units
and business process outsourcing units
with a workforce of 60,000 disposed 8000
tonnes of the waste last year.
Recycling
units: However, there
were only two modern recycling units in
Bangalore. Dr. Porst said the State Governments
should consider incorporating extended
manufacturers responsibility in their
IT policies prescribing norms that the
manufacturers and used industries had
to follow while disposing e-waste. In
India, the average life time of a computer
is expected to drop from the present eight
years to six years in a couple of years.
|
Unease
over environment clearances (November
23 2005 -The Hindu) The
draft Environment Impact Assessment notification
draws protests |
The
Ministry of Environment and Forests
(MoEF) has for some time now been under
attack, accused of a lack of commitment
to what it is supposed to safeguard. On
Monday, November 14, about 150 environmental
activists managed to enter the Ministry
premises in New Delhi and stage a sit-in,
protesting against its draft. Environmental
Impact Assessment (EIA) notification.
That day was also the deadline for objections
to the draft notification. The draft,
released on September 15, was a dilution
of the original 1994 EIA notification,
activists said. The protest action followed
a public hearing a day earlier in the
capital where about 25 affected groups
from across the country made representations.
A "death certificate" to the
EIA was issued during the protest action.
The yet-to-be released National Environment
Policy has been criticised for its lack
of consultation with communities and as
being economic growth driven, with the
idea of promoting private-public partnerships.
The draft EIA notification seeks further
dilutions. In the past 11 years, there
had been 13 amendments to the EIA notification
of 1994. the 13th amendment of July 4,
2005 relaxes the requirement for major
projects to get prior environmental clearance.
Instead, it says that the MoEF may, after
satisfying itself, grant temporary working
permission to major projects. This effectively
does away with the main reason for environmental
clearance, which is to ensure that projects
do not result in ecological disasters. |
The
Govindrajan committee on reforming investment
approval and implementation procedures
(October 2004) observed that environmental
clearance perhaps takes the longest time
and causes maximum delays to projects.
It seems that its observation have found
their way into the draft EIA notification
as it proposes that environmental clearance
can be given without public hearings,
if it is justified, "depending on
local conditions," Also, the validity
of environmental clearance has been extended
to 15 and 10 years in case of river valley
and other projects respectively, (earlier
it was five years from commencement of
the project). |
Kalpavriksh,
the Environmental Action Group that coordinated
the three-year biodiversity action plan
supported by the MoEF, was reduced to
releasing "Securing India's Future,"
the final technical report of the National
Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan
(NBSAP), on its own last month. The MoEF
is critical of the report for various
reasons. In a press release on October
5, the Ministry said the NBSAP submitted
by Kalpavriksh was rejected. The NBSAP
was reviewed by a group of scientists
appointed by the Ministry, the note explained.
They concluded that the report was, for
the major part, scientifically invalid.
Hence, the Ministry also said that it
had started the process of developing
the National Bio-diversity Action Plan
afresh. Ashish kothari of Kalpavriksh
claims what may be irking the MoEF is
not the 15 or 20 so-called factual errors
or the scientific flaws that were detected
by a three-member committee appointed
last year, but the recommendations of
the Plan, which are quite radical. It
has to be emphasised that it was the MoEF
that initiated the three-year process
of preparing the NBSAP from 2000 onwards
and 50,000 people all over the country
were involved in it in a massive consultative
process. Over 100 documents were produced
in the process and the final report was
submitted to the Ministry in 2003. Many
scientific institutions were also involved
in the process, funded by the Global Environment
Facility (GEF) through the United Nations
Development Programe (UNDP). The report
has a wealth of information and action
plans, which many States such as Maharashtra,
Sikkim, Karnataka have already started
to implement. |
The
NBSAP report comes at a time when the country
is losing nearly half its forests, 40 percent
of mangroves and substantial portions of
its wetlands. Agricultural biodiversity
was also under threat and this directly
impinged on the nutrition levels of people.
Mr. Kothari said the biggest threat to areas
rich in biodiversity was the threat of development
projects. One of the major recommendations
the NBSAP makes is to re-orient the development
process. Projects will have to conduct what
impact they will have on biodiversity in
future, before they are approved. It also
recommended a National Land Use plan that
would ensure that development processes
respect the sanctity of regions rich in
biodiversity. Apart from this, the report
also demands localised planning and governance.
India's richness in biodiversity needs to
be protected at all costs, not merely to
satisfy the requirements of the Convention
on Biological Diversity (CBD), under which
the country has to have a national biodiversity
action plan ready by 2006. |
Increased
global pollution confronts Montreal meet-(November
30 2005 -The Hindu) Carbon
dioxide levels now at the highest in 6
lakh years, say scientists |
Montreal
(CANADA): More than 180
nations on Tuesday began grappling with
gloomy prospects of increased pollution
and global warming at the first meeting
on the United Nations Kyoto Protocol,
as a political storm unfolded in host
nation Canada. Launched on Monday, the
12 day gathering of the U.N Frame work
Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
is expected to draw between 8000 and 10000
participants from Governments, businesses,
science and green groups. Its challenge
will be to frame the first steps for crafting
pledges on greenhouse gas pollution after
the present "commitment period"
of the Kyoto Protocol runs out in 2012.
"People who have sent their delegates
here want real progress," said Canadian
Environment Minister Stephane Dion. "That's
why here in Montreal, we have to get results. |
Scientists
warning:
Meanwhile, Lord May, the president of
Britain's scientific body, the Royal Society,
warned that global warming was an apocalyptic
peril whose effects are already visible.
"The impacts of global warming are
many and serious," Lord May said
in an advance copy of his speech released
on Monday, adding that the environmental
problems wrought by greenhouse gases "invite
comparison with weapons of mass destruction."
The environmental groups Greenpeace and
Friends of the Earth warned that the window
of opportunity was closing fast. |
Extreme
weather:
"Extreme weather events, drought
and rising sea levels threaten the lives
and livelihoods of millions of people
around the world. Negotiators must remember
this as they enter these talks,"
said Catherine Pearce of Friends of the
Earth International. Greenpeace campaigner
Steve Sawyer said the meeting urgently
had to give a sign that binding caps would
remain post-2012, otherwise the world's
fledgling market in carbon dioxide(CO2)
emissions could be wrecked. U.N. representative
Richard Kinley urged industrialised nations
to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions
that are contributing to global warming.
But experts pointed out that developing
countries such as India and China will
now have to contribute to anti pollution
controls. The Montreal meeting is the
first by the convention since the Kyoto
Protocol, signed by 156 countries took
effect in February. The pact commits industrialized
nations to making specific cuts in carbon
dioxide and five other greenhouse gases
that trap solar heat, thus warming the
planet's surface and disrupting its delicate
climate system. But the present commitment
period does not include the planet's worst
polluter, the United States which walked
away from the protocol in 2001 because
of the high cost of meeting its Kyoto
targets. Nor does it include fast growing
developing countries, such as China and
India, in its pledge on targeted reductions. |
A
small step: The present
Kyoto period is only just a tiny first step
towards tackling greenhouse gases that have
increased dramatically in recent decades
as fossil fuels are burned to power economic
growth. Atmospheric CO2 levels are now at
the highest in 650000 years, scientists
say, and 2005 is likely to go into history
books as the warmest year on record. Canada
is hosting the meeting amid domestic political
upheaval after Prime Minister Paul Martin's
embattled minority Government was outside
late on Monday by a 171-133 no confidence
vote in Parliament after months of acrimonious
corruption allegations. The motion came
after Mr. Martin rejected an Opposition
ultimatum to promise to dissolve Parliament
in January. |
|
The
final rules for the Kyoto Protocol were
adopted by consensus by the signatories
to the United Nations framework Convention
on Climate Change at a conference here.
The United States and Australia have refused
to ratify the protocol. The United States
on Tuesday opposed any talk of extending
Kyoto-style limits on green houses gas
emissions, angering activists at the 12-day
U.N. conference. "The United States
is opposed to any such discussions,"
Harlan Watson, head of the U.S delegation,
told reporters. He said that the U.S did
not want an approach with objectives or
a timetable to reduce the emissions. Washington
has since 2002 embarked on a policy to
reduce its emissions by 18 percent, Mr.
Watson said, without devastating the U.S.
economy. He praised the success of measures
put in place by U.S. President George
W. Bush.
|
Irresponsible
position:
The U.S. with five per cent of the
world's population emits 25 per cent of
the world's green house gases. "Delegates
say there are lot of issues on the agenda
but there is only one real problem the United
States," said Bill Hare, head of climate
change policy for Greenpeace. "This
is an irresponsible position," he said.
After an opening statement, the chairman
of the meeting. Canada's Environment Minister
Stephane Dion, said "Let us set our
sights on an effective, more inclusive,
long-term international approach to climate
change." Canada Greenpeace representative
Steven Guilbeault sent a message to Mr.
Dion, inviting him to "sideline the
Americans" to assure the "success
of the Montreal meeting. |
For
intensive aquaculture to become a sustainable
industry with minimal environmental impact
microbial ecology is critically important
as a scientific discipline; applications
of microbial ecology are needed at the
forefront of advances now being made.
Water quality and the control of disease
are interdependent and linked to the microbial,
especially bacterial, activities in ponds. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|